Technical Face-Off

Simucube 2 Pro vs Moza R16 Wheel Base

Last Updated: August 24, 2025

Disclosure: This post may contain affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate and Moza Affiliate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

Simucube 2 Pro

Torque 25Nm
Drive Type Direct Drive
Compatibility PC
Quick Release Standard


Check Price on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, Driver Labs earns from qualifying purchases.

Moza R16 Wheel Base

Torque 16Nm
Drive Type Direct Drive
Compatibility PC
Quick Release Standard


BUY DIRECT FROM MOZA

Driver Labs partners with brands. We may earn a commission from this link.

Omni-Engine Methodology: Aggregated analysis of 50+ technical threads, official datasheets, and user telemetry. Zero sponsorship.

The Specs: On Paper

On paper, Simucube 2 Pro (A) seems to have an edge with its higher torque of 25Nm compared to Moza R16's (B) 16Nm. Both are direct drive wheels, compatible with PC, and feature standard quick releases.

The Ugly Truth (Real User Experience)

I've seen users struggle with Simucube 2 Pro's reliability issues. It seems like there's a pattern of problems that can't be easily explained or resolved by Fanatec's support team. I've read reports of coil whine, high-pitched hums, and even shutdowns under heavy load. Users are reporting similar issues with power supply unit (PSU) problems, which is frustrating because it's not just a matter of replacing the PSU – it's a systemic issue that speaks to the quality control within Fanatec. The big problem here is that these issues can be both common and extremely rare at the same time, making it hard for users to pinpoint the exact cause or get help from the manufacturer. Moza R16, on the other hand, has its own set of problems. Users are reporting faulty units, overheating, and bases spinning uncontrollably. Some have even experienced brake-on failures, which is a major safety concern in any sim racing setup. The Moza community seems to be plagued by these issues, with some users expressing frustration at the lack of permanent fixes from the manufacturer. I've also seen complaints about the R16's limited torque (16Nm) being too low for high-performance simulations, and the robotic-ness of the wheel reacting to sharp inputs. Users have reported that the base can be finicky, requiring specific power cycling sequences or even replacing the PSU to resolve issues. It's like trying to tame a wild beast – you never know when it'll decide to malfunction. It's worth noting that some users have had positive experiences with both products, but those seem to be the exception rather than the rule.

The Verdict

For high-end sim racers who can afford the premium price point and don't mind dealing with occasional reliability issues, Simucube 2 Pro might still be a viable option. However, for most users, I'd recommend avoiding both products due to their questionable build quality and limited support from their manufacturers. If you're looking for a more affordable solution that's still reliable (ish), I'd say Moza R16 is the lesser of two evils. It has its own set of problems, but at least it doesn't come with the baggage of Simucube 2 Pro's notorious reliability issues. Just don't expect too much from either product – you'll be disappointed.

Sources: https://www.reddit.com/r/simracing/comments/100l05f/a_list_of_common_simucube_2_problems_their_fixes/ https://www.reddit.com/r/moza/comments/16i5936/r16_loses_ffb_almost_instantly/ https://www.reddit.com/r/simracing/comments/sewy19/is_simucube_really_that_much_better_than_fanatec/ https://www.reddit.com/r/moza/comments/15n6ofv/moza_r16_users_hows_the_product_after_some_use/ https://www.reddit.com/r/simracing/comments/13erfvd/simucube_2_pro_owners_any_issues_w_unit_not/
🏎️
Marco 'Drift' Rossi - Lead Engineer
Sim racer since 2010. Hates marketing, loves data.